Just to clear up some episode title rumors...

[powerruff1]

This is what I wrote in a recent e-mail to Mr. Warburton:

Hey Mr Warburton! There's been a few episodes floating around the
forums, and I was wondering if any of them are real.

I.S.L.A.N.D.
F.I.F.T.Y.-F.O.O.T.
B.O.X.I.N.G.
T.O.W.E.R.
B.C.
I.N.S.E.C.T.
B.U.S.T.E.D.-O.U.T.
M.O.M.M.Y.
M.A.R.S.H.M.A.L.L.O.W.
W.A.R.
S.U.R.F.I.N.G.
A.L.L.-S.T.A.R.S.

Are they?

And this is his response...

hey powerruff!

nope.

numbuh eleventy billion

aka mr. warburton

kidsnextblog.livejournal.com/



end transmission

[sternvoice] Don't trust Wikipedia, people. It's good for some things, but not for things like episode titles.

[NumbuhInfinity]

... That is quite possibly the best Mr. W e-mail response ever. I literally went "Damn" then laughed.

[numbah888]

At least he gave us a straight up answer. (That's pretty rare from him)

[victor]

Yeah, very rarely he gives you a clean answer........

[thesuki]

He does under certain circumstances, I've noticed.

When you ask about something specific and the answer will not give away an important factor of the episode. For example, stating that these fictional eps do not exist merely negated the rumors, but did NOT provide any true titles.

Asking IF the Guatemala Incident would be revealed got a straight Yes, whereas asking WHAT the Guatemala Incident was would result in a silly or vague answer, or a suggestion to watch CARAMEL when it airs.

Asking IF DOGHOUSE involved a birthday resulted in a No, whereas asking who's birthday it WILL be in CAKED-SIX would result in a vague or silly answer or a suggestion to watch the ep.

There's a pattern. ^^