|
Post by valerie on Oct 31, 2004 2:24:17 GMT
They did that to make her look like she was dancing to the music. They did that in LEADER too. At the end, they made Wally's touchdown dance go along with the ending credits music. Heee!
|
|
|
Post by cedric75 on Oct 31, 2004 2:44:32 GMT
Okay, I know this will sound strange, but one time when Fridays aired it (Not the debut) it used the normal ending credits instead of the special one for the episodes.
|
|
|
Post by numbuh3 on Oct 31, 2004 19:19:43 GMT
Something else I noticed but in ROBBERS. Was Numbuh 4 trying to spell the words wrong to spend time with the teacher? He said, "Hold on. I'm trying to spell Mississippi with no s's."
|
|
|
Post by numbuh3 on Nov 18, 2004 0:53:09 GMT
Sorry for bring this topic back, but this just came to my mind. In GRADUATES, when Tommy is named Numbuh T and everyone says T isn't a number, it is! T could be a variable. It depends on the equation is in algebra. T could = 1 if the equation is 7t=7. it would be 7x1(T)=7. it could equal 6575 if the equation is 10,000-T=3425. 10,000-6575(T)=3425.
|
|
|
Post by nathalie on Nov 18, 2004 1:50:32 GMT
we're getting off topic........
|
|
|
Post by numbuh3 on Nov 19, 2004 1:07:13 GMT
we're getting off topic........ Do you mean the whole FUTURE issue? I thought this thread was about things you have to realize in season 3. Hey! My 800th post!
|
|
|
Post by digigirl02 on Nov 5, 2005 21:16:06 GMT
Is it just me are did future, in a way reminds you of the x-men days of the future past, when Wally didn't defeat the girls, leading to a chain of events, and with Wally going back in time to stop it?
|
|
|
Post by Numbuh 0xFF on Nov 6, 2005 20:31:04 GMT
Sorry for bring this topic back, but this just came to my mind. In GRADUATES, when Tommy is named Numbuh T and everyone says T isn't a number, it is! T could be a variable. It depends on the equation is in algebra. T could = 1 if the equation is 7t=7. it would be 7x1(T)=7. it could equal 6575 if the equation is 10,000-T=3425. 10,000-6575(T)=3425. Even better, T could be a number in any numerical system whose radix is 30 or above. Just like F is a number (15) in hexadecimal. Horribly offtopic, of course, buth my inner math geek couldn't pass this opportunity.
|
|
|
Post by DR. INTOXICÅTION on Nov 6, 2005 23:09:56 GMT
There ARE undiscovered colors, maybe there are some undiscovered numbers as well.
|
|
|
Post by Shwoo on Nov 8, 2005 10:02:26 GMT
Well, there are complex numbers, which you can get from taking the square root of a negative number. The square root of minus one is i. They can be represented on the number plane. And think there's another set of numbers that you can get from the number cube, and another set from the number tesseract. Or something, we haven't done complex numbers or 4-dimensional geometry yet. Feel free to correct me.
Yeah, T can be a number in a base 30 or more number system. The Mesematopians (sp?) used base 60, which why we have 60 minutes in an hour and 60 degrees in each angle in an equalateral triangle.
I'm sorry about the offtopicness. I think my inner maths geek is feeding off Numbuh 0xFF's.
I wondered that about the Delightful Children as well.
|
|
|
Post by numbuheightbitstar on Nov 8, 2005 20:55:26 GMT
Is it just me are did future, in a way reminds you of the x-men days of the future past, when Wally didn't defeat the girls, leading to a chain of events, and with Wally going back in time to stop it? That's also the plotline to the Terminator movies...
|
|
|
Post by Numbuh 0xFF on Nov 8, 2005 21:38:39 GMT
Well, there are complex numbers, which you can get from taking the square root of a negative number. The square root of minus one is i. They can be represented on the number plane. And think there's another set of numbers that you can get from the number cube, and another set from the number tesseract. Or something, we haven't done complex numbers or 4-dimensional geometry yet. Feel free to correct me. Yeah, T can be a number in a base 30 or more number system. The Mesematopians (sp?) used base 60, which why we have 60 minutes in an hour and 60 degrees in each angle in an equalateral triangle. I'm sorry about the offtopicness. I think my inner maths geek is feeding off Numbuh 0xFF's. I wondered that about the Delightful Children as well. Math geeks of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your differentials! ;D You are spot on with the Mesopotamian number system. There's really no particular reason for the number system to be base-10 (knew a couple of old-school programers who did math in octal as a force of habit). However the bit with the complex numbers is slightly more...er... complex. You see, while you can make higher-order number systems (hypercomplex numbers as they are called) based on higher dimension systems (just like R is based on a line, and C on a plane (the Argand plane)) and these can be worked with (quaternions are very useful in Hamiltonian mechanics) they aren't fields. You see C is the topological closure of R, which means (shorn of the fancy lingo) that no matter what you do in C or R, you can't get anything that isn't already a member of C. There's a proof of this, and I tried to check it out but the top of my head kept unscrewing. Anyways, another interpretation of what I said is that there is no equation with real or complex coefficients (which encompasses anything we'd call an equation in everyday speech) that has solutions that aren't in C. This is known (or, rather, is the direct result of) the Fundamental Theorem Of Algebra A.K.A. Gauss's theorem. *Takes deep breath* So what was the point of all this? Well, the point is that if you'd say that t is say a component of an sedenion (think a complex number in 16-dimensional space) people could complain that, in that case, T simply isn't a number. Of course, I doubt that that's what KND members thought when they said that "t isn't a number", abstract mathematics not being their forte and all (And now I just know Mr. Warburton will make an episode where Sector V has a flaming row over the Poincaré conjecture)
|
|
|
Post by DR. INTOXICÅTION on Nov 8, 2005 21:57:48 GMT
Well, there are complex numbers, which you can get from taking the square root of a negative number. The square root of minus one is i. They can be represented on the number plane. And think there's another set of numbers that you can get from the number cube, and another set from the number tesseract. Or something, we haven't done complex numbers or 4-dimensional geometry yet. Feel free to correct me. Yeah, T can be a number in a base 30 or more number system. The Mesematopians (sp?) used base 60, which why we have 60 minutes in an hour and 60 degrees in each angle in an equalateral triangle. I'm sorry about the offtopicness. I think my inner maths geek is feeding off Numbuh 0xFF's. I wondered that about the Delightful Children as well. ...Uh Are you talking about my last post? I got that "Undiscovered Numbers and Colors" thing from a Foreign Objects song called "The Undiscovered Numbers and Colors". AND DONT USE BIG WORDS AROUND ME!! BIG WORDS CONFUSE ME!!
|
|
|
Post by Shwoo on Nov 9, 2005 3:39:49 GMT
...Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.
Numbuh 0xFF, you are my new favourite person.
|
|
|
Post by DR. INTOXICÅTION on Nov 9, 2005 12:49:20 GMT
...Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis. Numbuh 0xFF, you are my new favourite person. You got that word from Rocket Power! Is that even a real word?
|
|