|
|
Post by Nella (Numbuh 310) on Jul 30, 2004 3:51:29 GMT
Like there's no solid proof of 1/5, 2/5, 1/86 (and I'm not naming slash pairings:-[) So far the only canon couple is 1/Lizzie and some obvious 3/4 hints. Don't get me wrong, but isn't there a lot more proof of the above couples than KND/DC? They only interact when they fight. So I don't understand how KND/DC pairings are popular (other than the fact that they look cute, which I will admit, some of them are  ) But personally making couples inspire me to draw! And I like drawing!! Same here  So there is nothing wrong with being single but falling in luv is a part of growing up and that what makes it all fun!! True, but someone shouldn't be paired with someone just because love is part of growing up. *shrugs* (damn, I think I'm starting to repeat myself >_<; ) Anywho!! I simply luv the picture!! #5 looks amazing!! And Hoagie is cute too! *bows* Thankee. ;D Note: if anything sounded hostile at all, it isn't supposed to be. |
|
|
|
Post by mangogirl on Aug 1, 2004 16:27:14 GMT
Don't get me wrong, but isn't there a lot more proof of the above couples than KND/DC? They only interact when they fight. So I don't understand how KND/DC pairings are popular (other than the fact that they look cute, which I will admit, some of them are ) Note: if anything sounded hostile at all, it isn't supposed to be. I like KND/DC couples cause I like the whole Romeo & Juliet thing... (Without the lethal end of course!! lol ehehe) But it's ok if anyone else doesn't!! It's just my humble opinion!! I hope i didn't sounded hostile!! ;D Franckly I really don't like going into whole who's better with whom discussion cause everyone is entitled to hisown opinion. (And I respect them for that) Plus the only person who can prove everyone wrong is Mr Warburton!!Simply because he's the boss!!lol *huggles* |
|
|
|
Post by numbuheightbitstar on Aug 1, 2004 16:47:42 GMT
I dunno if I've commented on this couple, actually... well, as I said in another thread, IMO 2/5 is about as out there as 2/Lizzie. I'm sorry guys but I really can't see 2/5 really working out. The only "proof" it has is that 2 likes 5's older sister (which, ummm... I used to believe that one, but now that I've seriously thought about, it's hard to restrain laughter at just how rediculous that is) but I just see their personalities totally clashing. I can't see them thinking seriously about a romance relationship.
It's funny, actually... it seems like all the couples everyone else likes are the ones I think are least likely to actually work out in practice, even if they are cute in theory.
Just my two sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by mangogirl on Aug 1, 2004 17:07:05 GMT
I'm sorry guys but I really can't see 2/5 really working out. The only "proof" it has is that 2 likes 5's older sister My hero!!! I think I'm in luv!!  |
|
|
|
Post by pinkdenim on Aug 1, 2004 17:51:16 GMT
I really don't think you can say that 1/3 (And 4/5) have more valid proof than 2/5. Because, quite frankley Abby and Hoagie are adorable together ^_^.
|
|
|
|
Post by creelincoln on Aug 1, 2004 17:56:36 GMT
Yeah, and I mean, COME ON!!!!!! Who COULDN'T resist his OH SO handsome teenage face............
|
|
|
|
Post by numbuheightbitstar on Aug 1, 2004 18:12:53 GMT
I really don't think you can say that 1/3 (And 4/5) have more valid proof than 2/5. Because, quite frankley Abby and Hoagie are adorable together ^_^. LOL! *Glomp* That was a good one, Sam. But 1/3 look even MORE adorable together! ^__^ |
|
|
|
Post by pinkdenim on Aug 1, 2004 18:37:36 GMT
Hahahahahaha..... No.
2/5 are the bestest (next to 1/86 and 3/4) and I have alot of 2/5 fans to back that up, so HA!
^_^ *Returns the glomp anyway*.
|
|
|
|
Post by mangogirl on Aug 1, 2004 19:11:23 GMT
Bwahaha I think I'll say out of THAT conversation!!
|
|
|
|
Post by tako on Aug 1, 2004 20:33:43 GMT
I dunno if I've commented on this couple, actually... well, as I said in another thread, IMO 2/5 is about as out there as 2/Lizzie. o.o;;; .... .... .... Was that supposed to be funny? 2 and Lizzie BARELY INTERACT AT ALL. 2 and 5 interact a lot. I really don't think that it's possible to find as much 2/Lizzie proof as you can find 2/5 proof. I'm sorry guys but I really can't see 2/5 really working out. The only "proof" it has is that 2 likes 5's older sister (which, ummm... I used to believe that one, but now that I've seriously thought about, it's hard to restrain laughter at just how rediculous that is) Well, what's more "rediculous" than considering Numbuh 2's crush on Cree as proof is that you think that's the only 2/5 proof there is. Ha. Hahahaha. Here's a bit of 2/5 proof: They paired up for the dance in DATE. In fact, they paired up FIRST, meaning it's not like 3 & 4 paired up and then #5 was like, "Oh, crap, I wanted to go with #4 but now I'm stuck with dummy-head #2." They paired up first. ...but I just see their personalities totally clashing. I can't see them thinking seriously about a romance relationship. How can their personalities clash? They're both the most laidback members of their team. Maybe that means that they're not thinking seriously about a romantic relationship, but it doesn't mean that they're incompatible. My hero!!! I think I'm in luv!! °_° Are you being sarcastic? If not, then that makes me kind of sad that you're admiring someone for being closed-minded. |
|
|
|
Post by numbuheightbitstar on Aug 2, 2004 5:28:58 GMT
Well, what's more "rediculous" than considering Numbuh 2's crush on Cree as proof is that you think that's the only 2/5 proof there is. Ha. Hahahaha. Here's a bit of 2/5 proof: They paired up for the dance in DATE. In fact, they paired up FIRST, meaning it's not like 3 & 4 paired up and then #5 was like, "Oh, crap, I wanted to go with #4 but now I'm stuck with dummy-head #2." They paired up first. They also paired up specifically to leave Nigel with no one. Note the way everyone, EVERYONE, smirked on him. And did they actually DO anything together at the party? Seems to me right off the bat they seperated and meandered around on their own. .... You're kidding, right? "Where does he get those stupid lines?" "Uh-huh. Tell that to Captain Loser and the Dorkuloids." "Aww Numbuh Five you wouldn't know literature if it bit you on the--" Please look up what "being closed-minded" means. |
|
|
|
Post by numbuheightbitstar on Aug 2, 2004 5:38:16 GMT
Hahahahahaha..... No. 2/5 are the bestest (next to 1/86 and 3/4) and I have alot of 2/5 fans to back that up, so HA! ^_^ *Returns the glomp anyway*. Oh yea? Well I have a 1/3 + 4/5 CEILING FAN, so there! *Glomp!* |
|
|
|
Post by metallixkaren on Aug 2, 2004 5:50:41 GMT
o.o ..... Waaaaiiiittt...... Is this a discussion or an arguement? >.>
|
|
|
|
Post by tako on Aug 2, 2004 5:54:27 GMT
They also paired up specifically to leave Nigel with no one. Note the way everyone, EVERYONE, smirked on him. And did they actually DO anything together at the party? Seems to me right off the bat they seperated and meandered around on their own. Yes, they did actually DO something together at the party. They immediately went off and ate the party food together. Note how Numbuh 2 said, "Got your back on that!" as in he was WITH HER, not separate and meandering, as you say. Maybe they didn't dance together. But maybe they did. You can't know because Nigel wasn't paying attention to the other four after the first minute of the party or so. "Where does he get those stupid lines?" "Uh-huh. Tell that to Captain Loser and the Dorkuloids." "Aww Numbuh Five you wouldn't know literature if it bit you on the--" That isn't their personality clashing. It's their tastes. Well, maybe Numbuh 5's annoyance with Numbuh 2's lines might be a bit of personality clashing, but definitely not the second quote. Please look up what "being closed-minded" means. close-mind·ed or closed-mind·ed adj. Intolerant of the beliefs and opinions of others; stubbornly unreceptive to new ideas. Hm... This describes me, but I think it also describes you. Really, I don't go around saying, "The only 'proof' that 1/3 has is that Numbuh 3 likes rainbow monkeys and so does Numbuh 1's cousin (well, now that I've seriously thought about, it's hard to restrain laughter at just how ridiculous that is)." Actually, I've heard of this technique before and it's called beating up the straw man, as in, you take your opponent's weakest argument and counter it. But anyway, I recognize where 1/3 comes from and that it has some support in the show. Unfortunately, you say that 2/5 has NO proof, and that the proof that 2/5 fans find is absolutely ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Post by scone on Aug 2, 2004 6:02:26 GMT
EDIT:
crap. i had a big long entry and then Tako said everything i did. so essentially - i agree with Tako.
|
|
) 
