Delightful CoM
Field Operative
The Delightful One
(Insert generic text here)
Posts: 211
|
Post by Delightful CoM on Jan 16, 2007 20:00:19 GMT
He probably doesn't have time to answer right now or something. I'm also expecting expecting an answer to a question I asked him early last month. And this seems to be evident because the Q/A forum RARELY gets new threads these days.
Back to topic: Like the others have mentioned. Delightfulization is temporary (except for the DC, of course; but that one was because the machine blew a fuse). I remember I once read that on a thread over at the Q/A forum.
However, that question makes me wonder something else: What about the Delightfulization of the Interesting Twins (Op. TRIP, Op. RECRUIT) and the Rowdy Hooligans (Op. ENGLAND)? That's something else someone should ask Mr. W.
|
|
|
|
Post by thesuki on Jan 16, 2007 20:14:41 GMT
Maybe they were willingly Delightfulized. Or maybe they aren't Delightfulized at all. They could just be evil kids who joined up with Father because they wanted to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Celra on Jan 16, 2007 23:28:01 GMT
He probably doesn't have time to answer right now or something. I'm also expecting expecting an answer to a question I asked him early last month. And this seems to be evident because the Q/A forum RARELY gets new threads these days. Back to topic: Like the others have mentioned. Delightfulization is temporary (except for the DC, of course; but that one was because the machine blew a fuse). I remember I once read that on a thread over at the Q/A forum. However, that question makes me wonder something else: What about the Delightfulization of the Interesting Twins (Op. TRIP, Op. RECRUIT) and the Rowdy Hooligans (Op. ENGLAND)? That's something else someone should ask Mr. W. Yeah it does make you wonder. |
|
|
|
Post by valerie on Jan 19, 2007 4:55:40 GMT
What about the Delightfulization of the Interesting Twins (Op. TRIP, Op. RECRUIT) and the Rowdy Hooligans (Op. ENGLAND)? That's something else someone should ask Mr. W. The Rowdy Hooligans weren't Delightfulized. o__O Just because they were evil, doesn't automatically mean Delightfulization. |
|
|
|
Post by sjedmondson on Feb 1, 2007 21:54:31 GMT
I do love the idea that the delightfulisation was used as a punishment for failure.
And I agree with Valerie that the Rowdy Children we're not delightfulised.
The intresting twins are different, They seem to stay apart (Makes for better spies?), We have also seen in U.N.D.E.R.C.O.V.E.R That the DC can split apart if they want to. And the ITFBTM also have a speech "Uniqueness", they finish off eachothers sentances.
|
|
|
|
Post by Numbuh Googol on Feb 2, 2007 15:09:45 GMT
Yeah, I think he was only delightfulised for FOUNTAIN. I thought that was really funny. Creepy, but funny.
Lunk obviously works for the DCFDTL at times, but as it was just said, people working for them and Father aren't always necessarily delightfulised. I'm not really sure why he was for FOUNTAIN, since he doesn't seem to be in any other episodes, but it was entertaining.
|
|
|
|
Post by Celra on Feb 17, 2007 2:23:47 GMT
Yeah, I think he was only delightfulised for FOUNTAIN. I thought that was really funny. Creepy, but funny. Lunk obviously works for the DCFDTL at times, but as it was just said, people working for them and Father aren't always necessarily delightfulised. I'm not really sure why he was for FOUNTAIN, since he doesn't seem to be in any other episodes, but it was entertaining. I wonder if he ever will be again 0_0 |
|
|
|
Post by delightfulfreak on Feb 17, 2007 2:32:07 GMT
I thought that was a different Lunk?
|
|
|
|
Post by Celra on Feb 17, 2007 13:09:35 GMT
I thought that was a different Lunk? No its the same. |
|
|
|
Post by delightfulfreak on Feb 17, 2007 14:20:58 GMT
doesn't the one from fountain have black hair? and the one with the 6 gum gang have brown...? I'll go watch the episodes on youtube.
|
|
|
|
Post by Celra on Feb 17, 2007 19:59:03 GMT
doesn't the one from fountain have black hair? and the one with the 6 gum gang have brown...? I'll go watch the episodes on youtube. Mr.W said there the same person already. |
|
|
|
Post by Shwoo on Feb 24, 2007 1:09:37 GMT
It was the same Lunk. They temporarily Delightfulised him, I guess so he'd be easier to control.
|
|
|
|
Post by delightfulfreak on Mar 16, 2007 22:24:17 GMT
I don't understand if Lunk can be tempararily delightfulised,and the kids from operation DATE were also tempararily delightfulised but DCFDTL are perminatley delightfulised (Exeption of op.zero) so..........? Its confusing
|
|
|
|
Post by sjedmondson on Mar 16, 2007 23:48:44 GMT
I'm not quite following but I'll point out that the Delightfulisation chamber blew a fuse and increased its power eleventy billion fold.
This was an accident that couldn't be duplicated.
|
|
|
|
Post by delightfulfreak on Mar 17, 2007 0:48:04 GMT
Then how did everyone else become temparoraily delightfulised?
|
|
